Free Press or State Censorship?
In my views, I agree with free press more than state censorship, although state censorship is thought to be 'protecting' the audience, it is in fact blinding them from the harsh reality. Free press also offers more than one viewpoint or ideology and therefore enabling the audience to decide their own beliefs, whereas state censorship is one person manipulating the rest of us to believe what they believe in. Free press also sparks debate, healthy debates that we need to have to understand all viewpoints and opinions. Free press also politically uncover stories, stories that are interesting to the audience and things we should all be aware of, such as the story below on The Guardian's twitter page:
Some countries have state censorship for 'protection' which stop them from going on certain areas of the internet or news, which is just brainwashing the audience, making them believe that the world is perfect and that issues like racism are very rare, which is feeding them false information. State censorship is completely influenced by the ideology of the government.
Some countries have state censorship for 'protection' which stop them from going on certain areas of the internet or news, which is just brainwashing the audience, making them believe that the world is perfect and that issues like racism are very rare, which is feeding them false information. State censorship is completely influenced by the ideology of the government.
Comments
Post a Comment